French Caricature: Wet Nursing–Paying Consumers
The next two prints give very different views of domestic life. “Le Neuvieme Mois” or “The Ninth Month” by Louis-Léopold Boilly is an example of genre painting, which by definition depicts types of people rather than a particular person, generally in an unpretentious setting. Boilly captures the sentiment of an expectant couple. The mother-to-be sits in a chair, and while the man’s lower body is not visible, it appears that he is kneeling beside her. The future father is attentive as he rests one arm on the woman’s abdomen and wraps another tenderly around her shoulder. Leaning towards each other, their eyes lock on the other’s face, to the exclusion of all else.
Boilly’s sweet, sentimental picture contrasts with Grandville’s satirical caricature, another scene from his “Les Métamorphoses du jour.” The father figure, characterized as a stag with prominent antlers, holds an infant with the head of a baby bird, its beak wide open. The father exclaims, “what a likeness,” as he prepares to hand the baby to the goat-headed nurse he has summoned.
Grandville’s decision to transform his infant into a bird was a calculated one and emphasized a chief characteristic of newborns. A baby bird grows rapidly, but when hatched, its crop is small and has limited food-holding capacity. To accommodate rapid growth, feeding must be frequent. Baby songbirds in captivity need to be hand fed about every 45 minutes from six in the morning until eight at night for four to six weeks.23
Early writing about infant feeding frequently gave advice about the selection of a suitable wet nurse, indicating this practice had been utilized by those with enough money to pay for it for many centuries. In eighteenth-century Europe, anti-wet nursing literature expressed concern for the well-being of the babies being farmed out, but not much consideration for the offspring of the wet nurses who were often neglected or even permitted to die to make way for a paying consumer. Despite exposure to these anti-wet nursing pamphlets, the French employed more wet nurses in the nineteenth century than any other country, and the practice was common in all but the very lowest socioeconomic class.24 In the countryside a wet nurse would free up an able-bodied woman to work in the field. In the cities a woman working in a factory could not take time off or bring a baby to work so was forced to choose between either hiring a wet nurse or abandoning the child. A wet nurse preferred employment with an aristocratic or bourgeois family, such as Grandville illustrates, because working conditions were more pleasant and the pay was greater.
In 1801 the state passed a law assuming the financial responsibility for abandoned children.25 Foundling hospitals or hospices for children were established in large towns and employed wet nurses to nurse multiple children at the hospice itself or, more frequently, care for them in the nurses’ own homes. The hospice in Paris relocated 5,000 babies a year with rural women, who lived up to 50 miles from the city. Travel on deeply rutted roads during all seasons and all weather took up to a week with one stop during the day to feed and change the infants. After 12 to 14 hours of travel time, the wet nurses stayed at an inn where the hospice paid for their evening meal of soup that supplemented the four pounds of bread they were given when starting their journey. Deposited not at home, but at a department office, wet nurses could face a 30-mile walk. It is not surprising that abandoned French children taken to the home of a wet nurse suffered a 30-54 percent mortality rate between 1815 and 1885. What is surprising is that more babies survived in rural homes than in hospices.26
Because of the high rate of infant abandonment and the state’s assumption of responsibility to care for foundlings, French institutions experimented with alternate methods of feeding infants. If there were not enough wet nurses to feed the hospice babies, animals’ milk, generally cow’s or goat’s, was used.27 An image from 1816 in London’s Wellcome Institute Library shows two women holding an infant who is nursing directly from a goat. This method was utilized when the supply of wet nurses was inadequate, and also to feed syphilitic children.28 Grandville’s choice of a goat’s head for his nurse is as fitting as his selection of a bird’s head for the baby. The stag father’s comment, “what a likeness,” refers to both the nurse and the baby!